The Impact of the Black Death on the Adoption of the Printing Press
1Argument
Gutenberg's press was operating in Mainz by 1450 and within fifty years presses were at work in more than 280 cities. Some cities adopted the technology early and others late or never. This paper asks whether the size of a city's market decided which.
The Black Death of 1347 to 1352 killed about 40 percent of Europe's population and it struck cities with very different force. It killed people and left buildings, roads, and institutions standing. That makes city mortality a natural experiment in market size a century before the press arrived.
The plague could have moved press adoption in two directions. Wages rose sharply after the plague and stayed high in many places until 1600. A higher price of labor could have drawn in a labor-saving technology, which predicts that the hardest-hit cities adopted the press sooner. The plague also destroyed customers. A press carried a large fixed cost in type, which Dittmar (2011) puts at four to ten years of skilled wages. A smaller market could have kept printers away, which predicts that the hardest-hit cities adopted later.
The data favor market size. Using mortality as an instrument for city population in 1400, a city with 10 percent fewer people was 3.4 percentage points less likely to have a press by 1500 and printed 15 percent fewer editions between 1450 and 1500.
2Mechanism
Move the slider to set a city's Black Death mortality. The first stage of the paper turns mortality into population in 1400. The second stage turns population into the chance of a press by 1500 and the number of editions. Every number below comes from those two estimates, for a city otherwise at the average of the 169 cities in the sample.
The 3.4 points and the 15 percent in the paper are the slider's answer to a fall of 10 percent in population. The predicted chance of a press is a linear probability and is held between zero and one. The editions effect is computed from the log specification, so it is a percentage change from the average city.
3Evidence
Each panel plots every one of the 169 cities after removing the controls from both axes. The slope of the line is the coefficient in the paper. Hover over a point to see the city.
The first stage is the relationship the design rests on. Cities that lost more people in 1348 were smaller in 1400. The ordinary least squares panels show the raw association between size and print. The instrumental variables panels use only the part of population that the plague explains. Their slopes are larger than the ordinary least squares slopes.
4Map
The 169 cities with recorded mortality and population. Color is Black Death mortality. A filled circle has a press by the year on the slider and a hollow one does not. Size follows population in 1400. Press the button to watch the technology spread.
5Network
A city's own losses were one shock. The losses of the cities it traded with were another. The paper measures each city's market access in 1300 and 1400 from the populations of all other cities and the cost of reaching them, and asks whether the plague's damage to a city's trading network mattered on its own.
To keep the network shock separate from the city's own losses, the measure leaves out cities within a ring around each city. The chart shows the estimate for every ring width the paper reports, as the effect of a 10 percent fall in market access.
The effect is largest when nearby cities are left out at 50 or 100 kilometers and it fades as the ring widens past 150 kilometers. A city whose trading partners lost heavily was less likely to adopt the press, apart from its own losses.
6Identification
The design asks one thing of the plague. City mortality must be unrelated to whatever else made a city likely to print. The historical record supports that. Mortality depended heavily on how early a city was infected, and the disease moved in leaps that are hard to predict. It reached Valencia by May 1348 and London by September and did not arrive in Cologne until December 1349.
The chart below regresses mortality on 27 characteristics of a city measured before or apart from the plague, including geography, population in 1300, trade, and political status. If mortality were picking up a city's prospects these coefficients would stand out from zero.
The paper also controls for distance to Mainz, which other work uses as an instrument for the press. Here it is a control only, to check that mortality is not standing in for distance from the press's origin. The results are unchanged with it.
7Limits
The instrumental variables sample is the 169 cities with both recorded mortality and population in 1400. The market access results use a wider set of 470 cities. Mortality is not imputed for cities without a record.
Adoption here means that the catalog records at least one edition from a city. A press that opened and failed before its first surviving edition never appears, and a press that closed is still counted as adopted. The measure captures entry and cannot see exit.
The catalog records surviving editions. Lost editions are missing everywhere, and the design assumes their loss is not related to Black Death mortality.
The paper also finds that cities hit harder printed a narrower range of subjects. That result is suggestive and it does not appear above.